Remerciez-le!

Remerciez @Admin pour avoir partagé cet document gratuitement, de la manière la plus simple, en partageant sur les réseaux sociaux.

FREEDOM GUIDE THE OMNIBUS: 2005-2011 J. Croft HTTP://FREEDOMGUIDE.BLOGSPOT.COM

FREEDOM GUIDE THE OMNIBUS: 2005-2011 J. Croft HTTP://FREEDOMGUIDE.BLOGSPOT.COM HTTP://FREEDOMGUIDE.WORDPRESS.COM 2005 What have we died for? On fighting other people's wars. What have our people died for? I'm writing this on Memorial Day; established by the Government to commemorate all the people who died fighting for it… and presumably our Country. Presumably, because what have our people fight and hurt and die for? Here's a overview, in roughly chronological order of all the wars the United States of America has fought, and some commentary as to why. The American Revolution(approx 1775-1783) Remember, pre-Revolution, Americans were British Citizens… they were Subjects of the Crown. So, the British Colonials were looking for a new opportunity beyond the long settled and parcelled up England that had formed a crusty class system. The lower classes, rather than crudding up British cities more than they already were, were encouraged to come to America. There, they settled new farms, businesses, and pushed west-no, the British Crown set a stringent limit on settlements west of the Appalachian Mountains. A settler, even after seven years of indentured servitude(willingly selling yourself into slavery) to get over here became trapped between breaking the law and heading out into the frontier, and all the Native Americans not happy you're invading, or trying to buy ever more expensive legally settleable land. They certainly didn't appreciate the taxes Britain levied to pay off the debts incurred from fighting the Seven Years War, which was certainly a world war. Populist anger grew… The landed rich in America also resented England's policies; so much so they sought to assert their own colonial governments. The British Crown, being a imperialistic government, resented their colonials attempts at usurping authority so they sent troops to round up conspirators and confiscate arms. The Colonial British, having tasted freedom, were not so easily shackled to government authority as their modern day descendents are, so at Lexington and Concord they fought the Redcoats… and THAT'S when they can rightly begin to be called Americans! It was eight years of desperate fighting, a British Civil War-ordinary, and some not so ordinary citizens, pitting themselves against their own government. The British were the strongest single empire on Earth and had more than enough resources to crush this rebellion. Yet, they didn't. Why? People romanticize guerilla warfare too much. Certainly if you know your battlefield and were willing to put up with whatever deprivations came along and were smart and resourceful and sucessful you can wage such hit and run raids for a long time. Sooner or later however, if you want victory, you have to take on the enemy force and defeat them. Guerilla fighters with scavanged and otherwise second rate arms and training are at a huge disadvantage because to win against a determined enemy you have to meet them on the battlefield and defeat them. This can only be done against a determined adversary if you develop resources and industry to turn out soldiers and their weaponry and this can only be done by securing territory to safekeep those resources and industry, or securing weaponry from a third party. We had France, yet they didn't have command of the seas-England did. And the British Army went nearly anywhere they wanted in their Colonies because despite our ingenuity, tenacity, initiative and our much better marksmanship, when the Redcoats bore down on you en masse they were nearly unstoppable. They were the 18th century version of our modern military. So how the hell did the British lose the Revolutionary War?! Certainly when isolated or caught by surprise the Americans could win, but force to force-no. The British had the Colonials at Bunker Hill, but they escaped "somehow" across New York Harbor under the cannons of the Royal Navy. They were left alone to half freeze to death at Valley Forge. There were plenty of battles where the British should've won. And Yorktown! The British willingly let their forces get sandwiched between the bitchslapped to death Colonials and the French navy?! With England ruling the seas and thousands of Redcoats in New York City(we never did capture it)? It was a 18th century Dien Bien Phu for the British, and a thinking man can contend that certain high up elements might've set out to lose. What?! The British had a caste based society(which we inherited) and those that commanded came from the upper end of that society. Yes there were incompetents and fools but there were also geniuses. The British commander in chief, Burgoyne, was such a genius and for him to be able to understand his opponent's many weaknesses and not expoit them, with the material advantages he posessed? He and those immediately under him had what it took to put this rebellion down. He was a British Gentleman, a genius, and a Mason. The Masons virtually dominated British high society… which meant they virtually dominated Colonial American high society. Their ranks were filled with nearly all the leading figures on both sides of the conflict. The Masons have stamped this Nation with it's symbology for two centuries. Our Federal Reserve Notes, our fraternal organizations, our architecture, our government and law-Masons have dominated America. The Masons are secretive and although you'd think they're just a bunch of businessmen, local polical hacks and cops who get together, higher up there are some serious circles of power who get together… So whose to say the American Revolution wasn't thrown by the British generals? No other reason for American victory seems plausible. And saying that, is it totally out of the realm of thought that the reasons for the American Revolution were staged managed as well? As you read on, stage managed conflicts that whip up Righteous American Patriotism for viciously evil purposes become a staple of American history. Oh, before we go on, I have a question: have any of you read the Paris Treaty of 1783 formally ending the Revolutionary War? To sum it up, why all the flowery language and concessions towards King George III? Didn't we win the damn war? You'd think we were still technically part of the British Empire. If that's true then what did our ancestors fight and freeze and die for? Shay's Rebellion America was independent. Under the Articles of Confederation, each State was almost like a independent nation only they pooled together for common defense. There were however massive debts from the war and in some of the states taxes were ruthlessly levied. In Massechusettes, farms were foreclosed on for missing a tax payment, and without a "safety net" those farmers and their families would perish. BUT, instead there was a rebellion, and a sucessful one because the tax collectors backed off. It would be one of the few sucessful standoffs against government authority in American History(ironic, no?). Perhaps this is what prompted the Constitutional Convention-and did you know it was originally intended to amend the Articles of Confederation? The people who were in that convention had a different agenda-they were Federalists and they had a slick game plan. A banker's puppet, who were the creditors of the war debt, Alexander Hamilton pushed with all his might to sneak-SNEAK our current Constitution into being. And it's funny. We give lip worship to it, yet most Americans today don't even know what's in it. Essentially, it gives a form of representative government that was designed to on the surface mollify the well educated, well armed People just enough not to stage another rebellion, yet have enough wriggle room to expand the government. Quietly. Which is exactly what happened. Their opponents, the even more barely remembered Anti-Federalists, didn't pick up on the game plan in time to derail it. Jefferson was in Paris being a diplomat-and he'd never go along with such crap. But our hero, the masonic George Washington certainly did and his moral leadership was crucial. I recommend a book "Hologram of Liberty" by Kenneth W. Royce. Look for a distributor on the Internet and be ready for a rude awakening. War of 1812-15 Round two between Great Britain and it's breakaway colonies, partly because our ships and men were being dragooned on the high seas for fighting the Napoleonic Wars. Really it was another world war between European powers and we got sucked into it because we weren't strong enough to NOT be. Britain invaded, and probably could've beaten us-but all they did was do some raids, bombard some forts, and probably kept us occupied on our own turf long enough to not make another dumb mistake and help Napoleon. The American Wars of Conquest during the 19th Century The various Indian Wars, the Mexican-American War, the annexation of Hawaii. It was the same hustle; poor white trash would be encouraged to stake out a homestead on some native's turf, or a business(by some Mason)would go in and do the 19th century version of Wal Mart and monopolize trade. The natives would get screwed, naturally go to war to free their land, and then the U.S. Cavalry uploads/Geographie/ freedom-guide-omnibus.pdf